I think many developers have been wondering: How many bytes does an object instance take in managed code? What’s the limit for a CLR object? Are there any differences between 32-bit and 64-bit systems for memory allocation?
It is important for a database administrator to know what tasks and how have they been completed. To simplify this process, it is better to automate it, rather than perform it manually.
In this article, I will analyze on a particular example how to automatically collect data about completed tasks of the SQL Server Agent.
Databases that serve business applications should often support temporal data. For example, suppose a contract with a supplier is valid for a limited time only. It can be valid from a specific point in time onward, or it can be valid for a specific time interval—from a starting time point to an ending time point. In addition, many times you need to audit all changes in one or more tables. You might also need to be able to show the state at a specific point in time or all changes made to a table in a specific period of time. From the data integrity perspective, you might need to implement many additional temporal specific constraints.
There are situations when applications keep the database connection for a long period of time. It seems to be not important. However, if this application makes many connections or there are several applications with such behavior — things are getting worse.
This article is not a tutorial. It describes possible solutions to this issue. As usual, I will be glad to hear any alternative solutions.
Now, I am going to describe this process on a particular example to check whether it will allow us to determine the use of the object comparison by value in general and thus, to simplify a sample of comparing objects by value – class instances that represent reference types.
In my previous publication, I described the fullest and the most correct way to compare objects by value – class instances that represent reference types in the .NET framework.
Now, I am going to determine how it is possible to modify the proposed method to compare instances of the structs that represent value types.
There is an information system that I administer. The system consists of the following components:
1. MS SQL Server database
2. Server application
3. Client applications
These information systems are installed on several objects. The information system is used actively 24 hours a day by 2 to 20 users at once on each object. Therefore, you cannot perform routine maintenance all at once. So, I have to «spread» SQL Server index defragmentation throughout the day, rather than defragmenting all the necessary fragmented indexes at one stroke. This applies to other operations as well.
In this article, we will discuss typical errors that newbie developers may face with while designing T-SQL code. In addition, we will have a look at the best practices and some useful tips that may help you when working with SQL Server, as well as workarounds to improve performance.
In the previous article, we analyzed how to compare objects by value on a particular example with the Person class that includes:
- Overriding the GetHashCode() andObject.Equals(Object) methods;
- Implementation of the IEquatable (Of T) interface;
- Implementation of the type-specific static method Equals(Person, Person) and operators ==(Person, Person), !=(Person, Person).
Sooner or later, a DB administrator would like to have a performance indicator for SQL Server queries. As we all know, running Profiler for 24 hours will lead to a considerable system load and therefore, it cannot be considered an optimal solution for databases used in the 24/7 mode.
So, how can we detect the state of SQL Server queries? How can we run trace for detected query-related problems without the human input?
In this article, I will provide an implementation of the SQL Server performance indicator for queries, stored procedures and triggers, as well as its usage for the trace run. Read More